Should the Redskins Change Their Name?

The Washington Redskins are facing some recent criticism over their mascot and nickname "Redskins." Every 5 or 10 years some journalist writes an article about how the Redskins need to change their name because it is racist and a derogatory term used for Native Americans. I do not believe they need to change their names for a couple reasons; the purpose of a mascot or team nickname, and the history behind the name.


First, the purpose of a mascot or team nickname is to instill fear and superiority over their opponent For example, a sports team will never be called the Dandelions. A team nickname is supposed to be respected, feared and looked at as inspiration for the players and fans. If someone were to nickname a sports team the Crazy Carl's I would be honored, not offended. And for this reason I believe that Native Americans should be honored that the Redskins choose them as a team nickname.


Second, if you know the history behind the Redskins, the nickname actually doesn't represent Native Americans. The Redskins football franchise actually were called the Boston Braves after the Patriots involved in the Boston Tea Party. These Patriots dressed like Native Americans and dumped English Tea into the Boston Bay. The team later relocated to Washington and was renamed the Redskins. But the initial name was in-regard to the Patriots that took a stand against the very powerful British.


Over all if the majority of Native Americans find this nickname offensive then I believe the Redskins should change their name, but as time has shown, most Native Americans could care less if there is a team named the Redskins. Therefore the Redskins should continue to be called the Redskins and not give in to the media by changing their name.

Here is a link to redskins.com blog with a video on what other fans think about the Redskins changing their name.
http://blog.redskins.com/2013/02/13/fans-comment-on-redskins-name/#more-19995903